![]() |
||
Judicious Search
Asinine StatsTotal entries: 3147 Most Popular EntriesAnother problem with Islam in the modern world (9216) ArchivesMay 2008April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 Syndicate RSSNews LinksABC News Contact Form |
Wed Nov 30, 2005The War in Iraq is nearly overVictory is at hand
The election on December 15th will seal the issue beyond all doubt. Happy Holidays versus Merry ChristmasI hate this PC crud
Hey, I'm not religious. But I have immense respect for the Judeo-Christian heritage of Western civilization in general and the United States in particular. I like Christmas. I like the carols. I like the hymns. I respect the humanity that Jesus' message represents. Tue Nov 29, 2005Now Cunningham has gone down, is Murtha fair game?He should be, but is the GOP up to it?
Congressman Cunningham was a genuine war hero, as Belmont Club reports. Yet, he succumbed to temptation and has paid the price. Republican lawmakers say that ties between Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) and his brother's lobbying firm, KSA Consulting, may warrant investigation by the House ethics committee...There is more dirt documented in this post, involving Pelosi. It has been suggested that Murtha proposed surrender in Iraq to make him a target for GOP attacks. Then, when the ethics charges came up, Murtha could claim it was revenge for his speaking "truth to power". But now that a Republican war hero and corrupt congressman has gone down, it is going to be much harder for Murtha to use the political revenge defense. Murtha's call for surrender has already backfired once. If the Republicans had any spine, maybe they could make it backfire twice. Instead of insulating Murtha from an ethics probe, it may increase pressure to investigate his shady dealings as the most powerful Democrat on the House defense appropriations subcommittee. Murtha is a hawk for pork, but not where it counts. Joe Lieberman tells the truth about IraqIt is reassuring that there are still a few patriotic Democrats who really do support our troops His Opinion Journal piece is a must read. Send it to all your anti-war friends who woulds never believe anything that Bush or Cheney says. Joe might get through to them. Sun Nov 27, 2005Winter has arrived with a vengeanceDon't plan your holidays based on global warming
In the shorter term (centuries) weather is a random event. If you live in a snow prone area, expect it. It's going to happen. Fri Nov 25, 2005The threat of bio-terror attack has not gone awayFirst up, what happened to Saddam's stocks? David Warren reminds us that a bio-terror attack is still out there. He writes: Anyone familiar with their websites will know that a bio-terror attack claiming millions of lives has been the waking dream of Islamist fanatics for some time now -- a fantasy preferred even to alternative nuclear or chemical attacks. It is because of this, and because such a bio-attack would be easier to pull off, that Interpol arranged the first of three major conferences, in Cape Town this week -- to brief medics and police from several dozen countries on what they can do to prepare for it. The attack itself is “inevitable”, according to Ron Noble, the Interpol director.Let's go back and tie a few pieces together with lots of speculation. First, let's review how easy it would be to attack a major city with weaponized anthrax. Take a small plane, a few liters of anthrax, and a simple dispersal device and terrorists could wipe out a large percentage of the population of Los Angeles or Miami or New York. Oddly, Mohammed Atta (remember him?) spent some of his time in Florida trying to get a government loan so he could buy a small plane and convert it to crop-dusting duty. He was also interested in crop-dusting aircraft and kept hanging around a crop-dusting airfield in Florida. I wonder why he was interested in that line of business? Then add in Atta's possible second trip to Prague and meeting with an Iraqi agent, the ongoing mystery of the post 9/11 Anthrax mail attacks, and the possibility that one of the hijackers had skin anthrax. Since Al Qaeda did have not an advanced bio-weapons program, they may have needed another source of anthrax. Saddam seems the obvious choice. Perhaps Saddam, fearing that an anthrax attack would be blamed on him, decided not supply more than a sample of his anthrax to Al Qaeda. Was an anthrax attack plan A and the attack of 9/11 plan B? Perhaps it is fortunate that Atta went for the hijacking attack. An anthrax attack could have resulted in hundreds of thousand, even millions of lives lost. Wed Nov 23, 2005Al Arian terrorist case has gone to trialIt's good to see Palestinian terrorists getting prosecuted The Tampa Tribune Online reports that the long-running Al Arian case has gone to the jury. Here's the government's position: Earlier Monday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Terry Zitek completed the government's rebuttal of last week's closing arguments by the defense. Attorneys had argued that their clients may have voiced support for the Islamic Jihad but only sent money for needy families and orphans.Unlike the other cases that are making the news, this case is about Palestinian Terrorist organizations raising money in the US to finance terrorist attacks on Israel. Meanwhile, back in Cleveland, deportation proceedings against Musllim cleric Damra are dragging on. He is linked to Al Arian, as this NY Sun report explains: The defense lawyer also accused prosecutors of giving "some sort of exemption" to a Cleveland-based cleric, Fawaz Damra. Jurors have seen video of a frenzied, screaming Damra at a 1989 conference Mr. Al-Arian organized, declaring ,"Terrorism and terrorism alone is the path to victory." Damra was not charged in the current case, though he was named as an unindicted co-conspirator.It is possible that Damra will avoid deportation because the law is proving itself an ass, again. That will bring joy to some: The news has solidified Damra's standing within the Islamic Center of Cleveland, a mosque polarized by the terrorism accusations and the exposure of videotaped, hate-filled speeches. But Damra remains a controversial figure both inside and outside the Muslim community.I sure hope the FBI has that mosque bugged and infiltrated by informers, but somehow, I doubt it. Update: Damra has been arrested. 10 most under-rated movies of all timesSlight change of focus, but fun, anyway
The ones that come to mind, such as "Rocky Horror Picture Show" and the "The Blues Brothers" turned into cult classics. We love them both. The AP, Murtha and the Democrats take another blog beatingCourtesy of Policalities I'll quote the opening paragrah and urge you to read the rest: The headline on the Associated Press article reads, "Insurgent ambush in Iraq leaves 24 dead." Ever notice that when you see a headline like this, it turns out that the vast majority of the dead are themselves Iraqis? This particular case is no exception; only one of the fatalities was in fact a United States soldier. 15 were innocent Iraqi civilians, and, as it turns out, the remaining 8 were terrorists... or, to use your and the Associated Press's terminology, "insurgents." It's truly a unique way of reporting a battle. If the current staff of the AP were around half a century ago, they'd probably have reported "Battle of Iwo Jima leaves 30,000 dead." One doesn't usually lump enemy casualties in with friendly and innocent casualties, which leads one to wonder whether the AP even considers the terrorists to be the enemy at all.Yeah, given their perspective, the real enemy are our servicemen. Mon Nov 21, 2005Osama Bin Ladin and Congressman John MurthaMurtha should listen to Osama because Osama is surely listening to Murtha Junkyard Blog quotes a NewsMax piece that catches Murtha urging retreat from Somalia: After terrorists attacked U.S. troops in Mogadishu, Somalia 12 years ago, anti-Iraq war Democrat, Rep. John Murtha urged then-President Clinton to begin a complete pullout of U.S. troops from the region.Let's see how that retreat played out in Al Qaeda's thinking. In Osama's Fatwa of 1996 he said: Few days ago the news agencies had reported that the Defence Secretary of the Crusading Americans had said that "the explosion at Riyadh and Al-Khobar had taught him one lesson: that is not to withdraw when attacked by coward terrorists".Just when Al Qaeda is really feeling the heat in Iraq, up pops Murtha again, urging retreat and surrender. It's hard to believe that he served in the marines. Now he's just another White Flag Democrat. Sat Nov 19, 2005So, who is the enemy in Iraq?According to one marine, they are outsiders but expert Anthony H. Cordesman says that's false. Braden Files passes on a young marine's thoughts on weapons and the terrorists tactics and weapons.: The M-16 rifle : Thumbs down. Chronic jamming problems with the talcum powder like sand over there. The sand is everywhere.I was interested in his view of who they were fighting: Who are the bad guys?:That seems to directly contradict the recent Washington Post report that "Among Insurgents in Iraq, Few Foreigners Are Found". The report goes on: "Both Iraqis and coalition people often exaggerate the role of foreign infiltrators and downplay the role of Iraqi resentment in the insurgency," said Anthony H. Cordesman, a former Pentagon official now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, who is writing a book about the Iraqi insurgency.So, what's the truth? Are the bad guys foreign or domestic? It's an important question. If the bad guys are foreigners then the "fly-paper" strategy is working. If they are domestic, then we are in a guerilla war against the Sunni triangle. What is instructive is the "Operation Steel Curtain" campaign that Bill Roggio has been documenting at Fourth Rail. That campaign seems to have been designed to shut down the ratlines from Syria into Iraq. On these matters, I would trust the military doing the fighting over WPO reporters and think tank experts. Islam needs to answer a few simple questionsWhen they act like slightly exotic Methodists, maybe I'll trust them
Dennis Prager asks Islam for answers. Fri Nov 18, 2005That Atheist guy is really starting to annoy meOf course we trust God; it beats trusting Democrats, the UN, the French, Global Warming pundits etc. etc.
I'm not religious. That's just me. Most of my friends are religious. It works for them, and for all I know, they may be right. I like reciting the Lord's Prayer. If friends need prayers, that's what I recite. I like a lot of religious music. I love cathedrals and old churches. I'm just not into going there on Sundays. Proof that Fitzgerald was incompetentHe didn't interview Woodward two years ago In this Time report, we see: But it is the first time Woodward had contact with Fitzgerald, even though Woodward's name shows up on various White House officials' calendars, phone logs and other records during June and July, 2003, the time frame that is critical to determining whether a crime was committed when information about Plame's employment was shared with reporters. Those White House records were turned over to Fitzgerald long ago.(my bold). So, why should we trust anything he says or does? Hey, maybe he should interview Mr. and Mrs. Wilson, the VIP crowd, and ask Kristof more questions about what was said when he met the Wilsons. Ann Coulter predicted the coming of Murtha two years agoSometime she's harsh; often she's right Here's what she said: The Democrats didn't invent war heroes. What they invented is the scam of deploying war heroes to argue for surrender.Hat Tip and more at The Cassandra Page. And John Kerry is complaining: I won't stand for the swift-boating of Jack Murtha.This kerfuffle would be funny if the consequences of Democratic treachery, as evidenced in Vietnam, was not so dangerous to this nation. Thu Nov 17, 2005Murtha is the latest White-Flag Democrat to show his true colorsThis traitor wants the US to cut and run from a rag-tag mob of mass murdering Muslim fanatics Here's what the traitor said: Our troops have become the primary target of the insurgency. They are united against U.S. forces and we have become a catalyst for violence. U.S. troops are the common enemy of the Sunnis, Saddamists and foreign jihadists. I believe with a U.S. troop redeployment, the Iraqi security forces will be incentivized to take control. A poll recently conducted shows that over 80% of Iraqis are strongly opposed to the presence of coalition troops, and about 45% of the Iraqi population believe attacks against American troops are justified. I believe we need to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis.Actually, the primary target of our enemy are the liver-livered leftists who managed to force the US out of Vietnam a generation ago. Maybe Murtha has forgotten what happened in Vietnam. Maybe he's forgotten the millions of people who fled South Vietnam or ended up in re-education camps. Maybe he's forgotten that America's weakness directly led to the death of two million Cambodians. One reason why Bin Ladin was able to appeal to Muslims is that he took credit for defeating the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. One down, one to go. Murtha wants to give Bin Ladin exactly wants he wants -- a massive propaganda victory and a humuliated and weakened United States. An American retreat from Iraq would create far more terrorists than America staying until the job is done. The disaffected masses of Muslim youths in Europe and the Middle East would rally to Bin Ladin's cause in their millions. Wed Nov 16, 2005My quick marathon reportTwo in a month is doable, even for old baby-boomers
I ran my second marathon in a month last Sunday. It went pretty well. I finished in the same time as I did a month ago. I'd have liked to have done a bit better, but a headwind and increasing temperatures conspired against me. The running buddy who talked me into this ran the whole way with me. The Plame Blame Game is going to backfire on the MSMBig time, if the Libby indictment goes forward Just This Minute notes that: Keep in mind, following the Wen Ho Lee ruling the defense may have much broader subpoena power than Fitzgerald.Libby's defense team can do the job that Fitzgerald should have done. They can find out who leaked to which reporter and when. They might even call Joe Wilson and his wife to the stand and expose all his lies under oath. Even better, this kerfuffle might make reporters much more wary of using leakers grinding the same axe as the reporters themselves. No way should such partisan hacks be given more protection than other citizens. Former President Clinton gives aid and comfort to the enemyHe should know to keep his mouth shut when his nation is at war The Jerusalem Post reports that Clinton told an Arab audience in Qatar that: "Saddam is gone. It's a good thing, but I don't agree with what was done, " Clinton told students at the American University of Dubai.The hypocrisy is staggering. If he was so good, why didn't he tell Bush before the invasion that it would be a tough fight after Saddam's regime was taken down? 20-20 hindsight is a despicable trait in an ex-President, especially when he goes into territory the enemy regards as its own, and criticizes the Commander-in-Chief. The residual respect I had for him just evaporated. Fitzgerald's case against Libby has been torpedoedHe's going to be looking like a drowned rat real soon The WPO reports that: In a more than two-hour deposition, Woodward told Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald that the official casually told him in mid-June 2003 that Plame worked as a CIA analyst on weapons of mass destruction, and that he did not believe the information to be classified or sensitiveFirst up, that destroys Fitzgerald's time line. Libby cannot be the first administration official to "out" Plame. Secondly, it destroys Fitzgerald's credibility as an investigator. How could he have missed Woodward? Thirdly, we now have journalists (Pincus and Woodward) having a lot of trouble remembering who said what to whom and when. So, why should anyone believe a journalist ahead of Libby? I doubt anyone was deliberately lying; rather they trusted to the vagaries of their memories. Fitzgerald is now between a rock and a hard place. If he withdraws the indictment against Libby he's telling the world his investigation was a waste of time and money. If he proceeds to trial, he'll lose, proving to the world that his investigation was an even bigger waste of time and money. Libby's lawyer has already hit back: William Jeffress Jr., one of Libby’s lawyers, said yesterday that Woodward’s testimony undermines Fitzgerald’s public claims about his client and raises questions about what else the prosecutor may not know. Libby has said he learned Plame’s identity from NBC journalist Tim Russert. History may soon lump Fitzgerald in with Ronnie Earl as a zealous, partisan and incompetent prosecutor. Good links at The Strata Sphere, Decision 08, and Just One Minute Tue Nov 15, 2005Five Democrat Senators voted against the Democrat's call to surrenderOne Republican voted for it According to Fox News: The Republican-controlled Senate easily defeated a Democratic effort Tuesday to pressure President Bush to outline a timetable for a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. It then overwhelmingly endorsed a weaker statement calling on the administration to explain its Iraq policy.The surviving patriots in the Democratic party are: Conrad (D-ND) Lieberman (D-CT) Nelson (D-FL) Nelson (D-NE) Pryor (D-AR) The renegade Republican was: Chafee (R-RI) It also looks like the administration is starting to explain its Iraq policies. The Presdent's recent speeches on the subject have been very forceful. Check these quotes from his speech in Alaska: The terrorists regard Iraq as the central front in their war against humanity. And we must recognize Iraq as the central front in our war on terror. These militants believe that controlling one country will rally the Muslim masses, enabling them to overthrow moderate governments in the region - and establish a radical Islamic empire that reaches from Spain to Indonesia. If they are not stopped, the terrorists will be able to advance their agenda: to develop weapons of mass destruction ... to destroy Israel ... to intimidate Europe ... to break our will and blackmail our government into isolation. I make you a solemn commitment: This will not happen on my watch.Go read the whole speech. Would that our worthy senators could give similar speeches instead of carving up pork in the grand tradition of Washington bi-partisanship. Fri Nov 11, 2005Light blogging coming upDecided to run another marathon this weekend Can I run two in a month? I'll find out on Sunday in West Virginia. Looks like the Democrats are going back to their original plan of attack on pre-war IntelligenceFortunately, we've already seen the plan and Bush is counter-punching In the Weekly Standard of November 14th, Steven F. Hayes reminds us of just how the Democrats planned to use the Senate Intelligence committee hearings: On November 5, 2003, talk radio host Sean Hannity read on air from a memo prepared by the Democratic staff of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The memo described the desire of Democrats to reveal "the misleading, if not flagrantly dishonest, methods and motives of senior administration officials who made the case for unilateral and pre-emptive war."Their attack was aborted because the memo exposed their nefarious scheme. But they have returned to their theme of "Bush lied, Americans died". Whether Bush was playing rope-a-dope, or was just too distracted by Katrina and the Plame kerfuffle, he has come back strongly, attacking the Democrats for, well I'd call it treason, but Bush called it "rewriting history". Here he nails them: While it's perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began. (Applause.) Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and misled the American people about why we went to war. These critics are fully aware that a bipartisan Senate investigation found no evidence of political pressure to change the intelligence community's judgments related to Iraq's weapons programs.I'd say now would be a good time to aggresively pursue the CIA leaks and Joseph Wilson's lies. Thu Nov 10, 2005The Right's misdirected energy is costing the GOPLittle wonder Bush's poll numbers are down
Let's start with the Plame blame game. The MSM framed the debate exactly the way Joe Wilson and his CIA cronies wanted it. The bi-partisan Senate Intelligence Committee found that Joe Wilson was a serial liar. Did you hear any GOP senators or congressmen make any use of that information? I sure didn't. They just left the administration out to dry on that issue. Why are politicians so concerned about protecting terrorists?Have they forgotten WTC, Cole, 9/11, Bali, Madrid, London, Amman and the rest of their atrocitities?
They make the argument that we are better than them so we shouldn't stoop to their level. Sorry, that argument doesn't wash. Nobody is talking about the US blowing up innocent civilians simply to sow terror. Nobody is talking about the US taking innocent hostages and beheading them on CNN. Nobody is talking about the US hijacking civilian aircraft and flying them into civilian buildings. Tue Nov 08, 2005Media myth vesus reality on Bush's trip to Latin AmericaInvestors.Com scores it Bush 29, Chavez 5 Here's the New York Times editorial: After President Bush's disastrous visit to Latin America, it's unnerving to realize that his presidency still has more than three years to run. An administration with no agenda and no competence would be hard enough to live with on the domestic front. But the rest of the world simply can't afford an American government this bad for that long.Here's what really happened, according to Investors.Com: Only five states at the Organization of American States summit in Mar del Plata withheld signing a statement to restart talks for a Free Trade of the Americas pact, and four of those — Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay — did so temporarily on valid concerns about farm subsidies.The NYT moves ever closer to Soros territory. HT: Real Clear Politics Mon Nov 07, 2005The road to Baghdad Airport is safe under the control of Iraqi forcesBut trains to Charles de Gaulle airport have been cancelled Mudville Gazette quotes a Washington Post report that the road to Baghdad airport is no longer the most dangerous road in Iraq: In April, 13 people died along the route, including an American aid worker, Marla Ruzicka, who was killed on a sliver of pocked pavement that intersects threadbare fields and modest cement homes. In the median, the flying-man statue -- a familiar landmark that pays homage to a medieval astronomer who tried to fly, and ultimately died, using homemade wings -- was the silent witness. People died on this road in fiery, awful ways, and the flying man seemed to take it all in.Meanwhile, back in Paris: Traffic was halted on Thursday morning on a suburban commuter rail line which links Paris to Charles de Gaulle airport after stone-throwing rioters attacked two trains at the Le Blanc-Mesnil station.I suspect the "insurgents" in France are just getting warmed up. How long before the stones become Molotov cocktails? Sat Nov 05, 2005Premature JihadNice of them to put Europe on notice
The rioting in France continues as the Muslim underclass wreaks havoc on the platitudes of Political Correctness and European tolerance. After Madrid and London the world waited to see what would happen to France. Instead of igniting bombs in train stations, the radicals ignited the Muslim underclass. While many of the rioters are simply venting their frustration at living in a society that had some use for their parents but none for them, the instigators are using the ideology of radical Islam and the lure of Jihad to keep tensions high. Those arrested will be radicalized in prison and ready to rejoin the fight when they are released. The leak about the CIA secret prisons for terrorists needs to be investigatedOr is there a double standard in Washington?
CIA operative recommends husband for a CIA mission for which he was ill-qualified. He comes back with evidence that Iraq may have been interested in Niger uranium ore and then says the opposite in leaks followed by a NYT op-ed. Who gets investigated? The White House officials who tried to set the record straight. Thu Nov 03, 2005Has Saddam's WMD program been discovered already?Look no further than Libya
As a software developer I often spend time debugging programs. One little maxim I've found very useful, usually after bashing my head against a brick wall for hours, is "if you can't find the problem where you're looking then you are looking in the wrong place". I think that maxim applies to WMD. Some of this speculation was confirmed when these reports surfaced claiming that the Niger Forgeries were created by Libya to divert suspicions from a Libya-Iraq-Egypt alliance, where Libya purchased the yellowcake for Saddam and others.Googling "Iraq Libya weapons cooperation" turns up this 1998 report that goes into further detail on joint WMD development efforts between Iraq and Libya. I have no idea how accurate this report is, but it does suggest that Saddam out-sourced WMD development to Libya and provided some of his scientists to help the effort:New attempts are being made by officials from Niger to obfuscate the political picture with regard to the supply of Niger-originating uranium to Iraq. However, there is now a growing possibility that the reality that Niger supplied uranium to Libya, and that Libya hosted the Iraqi strategic weapons programs from about 1998 onwards, will be openly acknowledged by US and UK governments in the near future.I have no clue to the veracity of these claims or where this group comes from. But the fact that we found a nuclear weapons capability in Libya shortly after Saddam’s regime fell is consistent with the scenario were we traced Saddam’s weapons to Libya and Libya gave up the ghost when we confronted them. However, by the mid 1990s, Baghdad could no longer be selective in its cooperation with Libya. The BND's 1994 studies of the Iraqi procurement system in Europe was unsettling for it threatened Iraq's ability to revive key WMD programs just as the Iraqi system was being restored to its pre-Gulf War magnitude. Moreover, the UN inspection regime was beginning to grasp the complexity of the Iraqi challenge. Indeed, even before the Summer 1995 "defection" of Lt.Gen. Hussein Kamal, the UN was increasing its efforts to locate hidden stuff. As discussed above, Kamal's "defection" was prompted by Baghdad's apprehension that the UN was capitalizing on data provided by genuine defectors in order to zero in on Iraq's hidden WMD facilities. For example, Iraq's biological facilities were first subjected to a meaningful inspection in April 1995, on the eve of the "defection." Even though by then, Baghdad had already hidden its biological weapons cache and destroyed all evidence of its existence, the mere UN visit to the abandoned sites was too close for comfort.I did spot the following transcript from the report that The Strata Sphere linked to: Former US Federal Prosecutor John Loftus in May 2004 confirmed on Fox News some of the earlier 2002, 2003 and 2004 reporting by GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs that Libya had hosted the Iraqi nuclear program, and further detail was added to this in the June 2004 book by GIS Senior Editor Yossef Bodansky, The Secret History of the Iraq War. Loftus, however, failed to note the Niger connection which was literally verified by the deception operation mounted by the Libyan ESO. Loftus told Fox News interviewer Eric Shawn:Now we understand why Qadhafi was so frightened by Saddam's fate that he surrendered their joint WMD programs. The link to Saddam would have condemned his regime to the same fate as Saddam's. The Paris riots foretold (and 9/11)Theodore Dalrymple explained why France is in deep trouble in City Journal (Autumn 2002) Big Lizard asks: Is This the "Third Intifada" -- Or Not?Theodore Dalrymple provided important background and a prediction back in 2002. He wrote: But among the third of the population of the cités that is of North African Muslim descent, there is an option that the French, and not only the French, fear. For imagine yourself a youth in Les Tarterets or Les Musiciens, intellectually alert but not well educated, believing yourself to be despised because of your origins by the larger society that you were born into, permanently condemned to unemployment by the system that contemptuously feeds and clothes you, and surrounded by a contemptible nihilistic culture of despair, violence, and crime. Is it not possible that you would seek a doctrine that would simultaneously explain your predicament, justify your wrath, point the way toward your revenge, and guarantee your salvation, especially if you were imprisoned? Would you not seek a “worthwhile” direction for the energy, hatred, and violence seething within you, a direction that would enable you to do evil in the name of ultimate good? It would require only a relatively few of like mind to cause havoc. Islamist proselytism flourishes in the prisons of France (where 60 percent of the inmates are of immigrant origin), as it does in British prisons; and it takes only a handful of Zacharias Moussaouis to start a conflagration.That future conflagration may have found its spark. Dalrymple continues: The French knew of this possibility well before September 11: in 1994, their special forces boarded a hijacked aircraft that landed in Marseilles and killed the hijackers—an unusual step for the French, who have traditionally preferred to negotiate with, or give in to, terrorists. But they had intelligence suggesting that, after refueling, the hijackers planned to fly the plane into the Eiffel Tower. In this case, no negotiation was possible.Read more » If you ask the wrong questionYou get the wrong answer
In the WSJ tday (11/3/05) Victoria Toensing skewers the CIA for failing to protect Plame's cover and then complaining to the DOJ when Novak finally spilled the beans. Dogged Special Proscecutor Patrick Fitzgerald indicted Libby on specious grounds after failing to find out who leaked Plame's cover to Robert Novak and, for that matter, David Corn of the Nation. The question that Fitzgerald should have asked was not, who leaked Plame's cover, but rather who blew Plame's cover. The special prosecutor and reporters should ask Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas Hogan, who is overseeing the grand jury, to conduct a hearing to require the CIA to identify all affirmative measures it was taking to shield Plame's identity. Before we even think about sending reporters to prison for doing their jobs, the court should determine that all the elements of a crime are present.The CIA failed to take the simplest possible measure to protect Plame's cover when they followed her suggestion and sent her ill-qualified husband on an undercover mission without requiring him to sign a confidentiality agreement. It's almost as if the CIA wanted him to write that NYT
|
Random PostsCompounding Errors5 Killed Light blogging coming up |
| www.asininity.com 2001-2003PHP | hosting provided by pMachine |