Judicious Search


Advanced search

Asinine Stats

Total entries: 3147
Comments:
1905

Most Popular Entries

Another problem with Islam in the modern world (9216)
Kerry picks Edwards (7750)
With Friends Like These (7540)
Kerry's big speech on National Security (7521)
2003 Weblog Awards (5964)
North Korean's Defect (5308)

Archives

May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003

Syndicate RSS

Judicious Asininity blog, news, views, opinions

News Links

ABC News
American Daily
American Enterprise Institute
boortz.com
Capitalism Magazine
Chicago Tribune
Chicago Sun-Times
CNEWS - Canada
CNSNews.com
Commentators
City Journal
CNN
Canadian TV
Daily News
DEBKAfile
Drudge Report
FOXnews
Google News
Insight Mag
Jerusalem Post
Journal News
LA Times
Lucianne.com
MarkSteynOnline
Mercury News

Miami Herald
MSN Slate Magazine

National Review Online
Media Research

MEMRI
Middle East Newsline
Moreover
MSNBC
Muslim News
NATIONAL POST Canada
The Nation
New York Times

NY Daily News
NYPOST.COM
Newsday
NewsMax
NRO
Opinion Journal
Reductio ad Absurdum
Pakistan Daily Times
RealClear Politics

Reuters
Roll Call
Saudi-Online
Sky News
Slate
Sydney Morning Herald
The Observer
The Scotsman
The Union Leader
TIME
Times of India
Town Hall
UPI
U.S. Politics Today
US News and World Report
USA Today
Washington Times
Weekly Standard
Worldnetdaily
Yahoo! News

Contact Form

Your Email
Subject
Message

This is the Archive Page.
Click Here for Main Page

Sat Sep 30, 2006

Some Catholics understand this religious war

Andrew Greeley gets the nature of the enemy

Lawrence Auster at View from the Right links to an op-ed by Andrew Greeley, a left-liberal Catholic priest, published a few short months after 9/11. Greeley starts:

Instead of dropping bombs and killing innocent people, the cliche insists, the United States should deal with the "underlying causes" of anti-American resentment in the Muslim world. It should ask what are the reasons that so many Muslims all over the world hate and resent us. Americans should ask whether American injustice and oppression have created such emotions. If we back off from these underlying causes, then the hatred will abate.

This is the constant mantra of pseudo liberals, clergy (especially priests in England and Ireland), academics, journalists, European intellectuals, and wise men and women all over the world. Such comments are cheap grace, a strategy for sounding both profound and superior in dinner party chatter, faculty lounge posture, and outraged letters to the editor. It is innocent of thought and meaning. There is but one way that Americans could stop being the target of virulent hatred from Islamic extremists: We would have to stop being infidels and convert to Islam. They want to kill us because the United States is the most powerful nation in the world and is a nation of infidels. The power of America by right belongs to Islam.

Therefore death to the infidels! Death to Americans!
Go read the rest.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 30, 06 | 9:54 pm |
| [1] comments (660 views) |  | Permalink | [120] TrackBack |

The Jimmy Carter Generals

Traitors, one and all

Just saw Lt. General Paul Van Riper (USMC Retired) on Fox News Bret Baier's Rumsfeld interview. He was publicly calling for Rumsfeld's resignation. He joins a list of ex-Generals who have gone public. Their actions undermine the US military chain of command during a war. Their actions give aid and comfort to the enemy. Their actions give aid and comfort to the Democrats, which amounts to much the same thing.

Ex-Presidents are supposed to stay out of the political arena and avoid criticizing their successors. Ford did this. Reagan did this. Bush 41 did this. They showed the appropriate respect for the office of the Presidency. Strange that they are all Republicans.

Jimmy Carter has not. Carter was the worst President in modern US history. He is the worst ex-President in US history. He has worked against America's interests in the Middle East, in Korea and in Venezuela. He is neither a gentleman nor a patriot. Carter must have misheard "My country, right or wrong" as "My country, always wrong". He sure acts that way.

It seems a bunch of disgruntled Generals (Major General Paul D. Eaton, General Anthony C. Zinni, Lieutenant General Gregory Newbold, Major General John Batiste, Major General John Riggs and Major General Charles H. Swannack Jr) have decided to forgo honor and loyalty and join the Democrats in piling onto the Secretary of Defense, and by extension, the President, during a time of war. That makes them the Jimmy Carter Generals.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 30, 06 | 8:44 pm |
| [2] comments (701 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Thu Sep 28, 2006

Our Islamic enemies should be shown no mercy

And their version of Islam no respect

Ann Coulter is right on the money sometimes, and off the planet other times. Here she's dead right:

The belief that we can impress the enemy with our magnanimity is an idea that just won't die. . . . But being nice to enemies is an idea that has never worked, no matter how many times liberals make us do it. It didn't work with the Soviet Union, Imperial Japan, Hitler or the North Vietnamese -- enemies notable for being more civilized than the Islamic savages we are at war with today.
Hat tip to Chuck Muth, who also gives us another relevant quote from Cliff May, president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies:
Many commentators have noted the apparent irony: The Pope suggests Islam encourages violence - and Muslims riot in protest. . . . Many commentators are missing the point: These protestors - and those who incite them -- are not asking for mutual respect and equality. They are not saying: 'It's wrong to speak ill of a religion.' They are saying: 'It's wrong to speak ill of our religion.'

"They are not standing up for a principle. They are laying down the law. They are making it as clear as they can that they will not tolerate 'infidels' criticizing Muslims. They also are making it clear that infidels should expect criticism - and much worse - from Muslims. They are attempting nothing less than the establishment of a new world order in which the supremacy of what they call the Nation of Islam is acknowledged, and 'unbelievers' submit - or die.
If that's the choice they present then they'll be doing all the dying. Actually, it looks like we've made a good start in Iraq. Captain's Quarters notes that:
The leader of Al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Ayyub al-Masri, released an audiotape that tries to recruit more radical Muslims to the Iraqi jihad. In doing so, Zarqawi's replacement shows why the US considers Iraq a central ground for the war on terror and how effective our effort there has been against the terrorists. Unbidden and apparently thinking it an attraction, Masri told his followers that the US-led Coalition has killed over 4,000 terrorists in Iraq.
The attraction must be the 288,000 virgins they were promised.

The House and Senate have agreed that Muslim nutjobs caught trying to kill infidels (that's us) should not be granted the rights of US citizens. I don't think they should be allowed to practice their demented version of Islam while in custody, either, but that's just my view. We didn't give German POWs copies of Mein Kampf or Hitler's version of the Bible. Why give Muslim nutjobs the source of their inspiration? Acting like their religion is acceptable doesn't seem like a good strategy.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 28, 06 | 11:07 pm |
| [0] comments (555 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Tue Sep 26, 2006

The difference between Clinton and Bush II

It's pretty simple

This entry at Investors.Com sums it up quite nicely:

When the World Trade Center was attacked in 1993, you [Clinton] went to court. When it was attacked in 2001, President Bush went to war.
The Democrats want to return to the Clinton era. Until they wise up they will continue to lose.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 26, 06 | 11:50 pm |
| [1] comments (653 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Mon Sep 25, 2006

Iraq may be a mess but it's not a mistake

Unless you think Muslim terrorism is a minor annoyance and terrorists are little more than common criminals

Consider where we would be if Saddam was still in power (in no particular order):

1. Palestinian terrorists would still be rewarded for killing Jews.

2. The sanctions regime would have collapsed, under pressure from our allies, the French, the Russians and the Chinese.

3. Weapons inspectors would still be excluded from Iraq.

4. The US and Britain would still be tied down policing the no-fly-zones.

5. Saddam would still be supporting terrorists - never forget that he sheltered some of the worst, including the WTC bombing ringleader.

6. Iraqis would be dying in far greater numbers than today.

7. Kurdistan would be living under imminent threat.

8. The marshes would still be waterless.

9. Saddam's weapons program would have been restarted, possibly with aid from AQ Khan's network.

10. Libya's nuclear weapons program would be closer to producing a nuclear weapon.

11. The resources that Islamic fascists have had to pour into Iraq would have been diverted to targets closer to home.

News flash: (courtesy of The Strata-sphere)

BRITISH troops in Iraq said they had killed one of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden’s top global lieutenants, who escaped from a US prison in Afghanistan last year.

Omar Faruq was shot dead while resisting arrest during a pre-dawn raid by about 200 British troops in Iraq’s second biggest city, Basra, British military spokesman Major Charlie Burbridge said.

US leaders have described Faruq as the top al-Qaeda operative in South-East Asia.He was caught in Indonesia in 2002 and held at a high-security detention centre at Bagram airbase, north of the Afghan capital Kabul, until his escape last year.


Why was Faruq in Iraq? It's no longer a safe haven for terrorists, as Jordanian terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi discovered.

12. Saddam's continued flouting of UNSC resolutions would leave the UN even more impotent than it is now.

13. The US would not have Iran bordered by US allies to the East and West.

14. As Richard Clarke noted, Osama may well have "boogied to Baghdad" after theTaliban was removed from power.

15. The 500 tons of yellowcake that Saddam had stockpiled would be in the process of being converted into nuclear weapons material.

16. Lots of terrorists would still be alive.

17. An odious regime would still be killing its citizens.

18. Saddam's loathsome sons would still be in line to take over.

The costs of invading Iraq include:

1. The US has lost over 2000 good men and women.

2. The US has spent a lot of money on the war.

3. The war has made the US unpopular with Muslims outside of Iraq and Afghanistan.

4. The war has split the US domestically when it needs to be united.

5. The war has made the US unpopular in Europe.

6. Parts of Iraq are still beset by sectarian violence.

7. The left wing of the Democratic party has taken over the party and condemned it to the political wilderness.

Two more things to ponder:

Does anyone think Saddam would stand idle while Iran built nuclear weapons?

After the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, the United States attacked the Vichy French in North Africa in its first offensive action of WW2. Heck, the French had lost their colonies in the Far East to the Japs. Why hit them? Simple answer: because the US could and because it weakened the Axis. If you accept that the West is once again fighting the expansionist forces of Islam in a war that has waxed and waned over the centuries, then driving a stake into the heart of the Middle East makes strategic sense. If you think that Muslim terrorism is a minor annoyance and the terrorists are little more than common criminals, then Iraq looks like a mistake.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 25, 06 | 10:18 pm |
| [1] comments (597 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Sun Sep 24, 2006

So, the Jihadists are expanding their ranks

That's what they'd do whatever we do (unless we submit to Islam)

Captain's Quarters responds to the NIE report leaked to the NYT (where else) that claims that the Iraq war has "created a new generation of jihadists".

I'm willing to bet that the Japanese military exapanded its ranks when America reacted to Pearl Harbor by attacking the Vichy French in North Africa. I'm willing to bet the Nazis expaanded their ranks when England fought back after Dunkirk.

All Muslims are latent Jihadists. Their "religion" expands by force and glorifies those who die expanding dar al-Islam (that's them) and contracting dar al-harb (that's us). As non-Muslims resist Muslim aggression, the Muslims will issue calls to arms and gullible young "men" will flock to the cause. Why the scare quotes? Would a real man slit a hostage's throat? Would a real man kill innocents civilians on his way to paradise? Would a real man use places of worship as a figthing postion? So sure, more Muslims are following Muhammed's instructions:

But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
The good news is that we are doing a good job of killing and capturing their leaders and experts. We face a greater threat of pinprick attacks but a lesser threat of a large scale attack like 9/11.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 24, 06 | 8:44 pm |
| [0] comments (688 views) |  | Permalink | [25] TrackBack |

Another Crescent 9/11 Memorial

Enough is enough

Danegerous posts about a crescent shaped 9/11 Memorial in Arizona. This one is replete with politically correct but idiotic platitudes such as "You don’t win battles of terrorism with more battles". So what are we supposed to do? Roll over and play dead?

This memorial follows the cresent design for the Flight 93 Memorial that Error Theory exposed.

God knows what outrages will be perpetrated on the site of the World Trade Center.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 24, 06 | 1:42 pm |
| [0] comments (610 views) |  | Permalink | [17] TrackBack |

Thu Sep 21, 2006

Tainted Spinach And Antibiotics Are a Bad Match

That's bad news

The Loom explains why:

Like other microbes, Escherichia coli O157:H7 carries a number genes that were delivered to it by viruses. In some cases, the viral DNA has mutated to the point that it cannot produce new viruses, and so the genes can only be passed down from one generation to the next. In other cases, the viruses are dormant but still independent. In response to stress, Escherichia coli starts making new copies of the virus, which then burst out of their host. Antibiotics are among the stresses that trigger the viruses to escape. It's a good strategy for the virus, because it can escape from its host before the antibiotics kill the bug. It's not so good for the host, of course, and can be pretty bad for us as well. That's because the toxins in Escherichia coli that can cause organ failure are actually carried by the viruses. The genes only become active as the host begins making new viruses. That means that if you take antibiotics for infection with Escherichia coli O157:H7, you may wipe out the infection, but you may also trigger organ failure.

As a result, the advice from experts on this bug is to just rig patients up with hydration and hope for the best. While a few people may suffer organ failure even without antibiotics, in most cases the bloody diarrhea passes, and people recover. Let sleeping viruses lie.
Just thought you'd like to know that there are life-forms out there besides Muslim nutjobs that want to kill us.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 21, 06 | 11:28 pm |
| [0] comments (593 views) |  | Permalink | [2] TrackBack |

Wed Sep 20, 2006

Ahmadinejad at the UN

Promotes the 12th Imam again

The UN has provided a transcript (.pdf) of the Iranian President's speech. I took note of this paragraph:

The Almighty and Merciful God, who is the Creator of the Universe, is also its
Lord and Ruler. Justice is His command. He commands His creatures to support one
another in Good, virtue and piety, and not in decadence and corruption.
He commands His creatures to enjoin one another to righteousness and virtue
and not to sin and transgression. All Divine prophets from the Prophet Adam (peace
be upon him) to the Prophet Moses (peace be upon him), to the Prophet Jesus Christ
(peace be upon him), to the Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him), have all called
humanity to monotheism, justice, brotherhood, love and compassion. Is it not possible
to build a better world based on monotheism, justice, love and respect for the rights of
human beings, and thereby transform animosities into friendship?

I emphatically declare that today's world, more than ever before, longs for just
and righteous people with love for all humanity; and above all longs for the perfect
righteous human being and the real savior who has been promised to all peoples and
who will establish justice, peace and brotherhood on the planet.
He appeals to all the major monotheistic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) and then puts in a plug for the 12th Imam. I doubt he's plugging for the Jewish Messiah. Given his history, it is more likely he is ramming the Shi'ite belief in the 12th Imam down a gullible world's throat. Here's where he's coming from, according to a report from Persian Journal
According to Shi'ite Muslim teaching, Abul-Qassem Mohammad, the 12th leader whom Shi'ites consider descended from the Prophet Mohammed, disappeared in 941 but will return at the end of time to lead an era of Islamic justice.

"Our revolution's main mission is to pave the way for the reappearance of the 12th Imam, the Mahdi," Ahmadinejad said in the speech to Friday Prayers leaders from across the country.

"Therefore, Iran should become a powerful, developed and model Islamic society."

"Today, we should define our economic, cultural and political policies based on the policy of Imam Mahdi's return. We should avoid copying the West's policies and systems," he added, newspapers and local news agencies reported.

Ahmadinejad refers to the return of the 12th Imam, also known as the Mahdi, in almost all his major speeches since he took office in August.

A September address to the U.N. General Assembly contained long passages on the Mahdi which confused Western diplomats and irked those from Sunni Muslim countries who believe in a different line of succession from Mohammed.
It's a dangerous world when a dictator with a nuclear weapons program bases his policies on an apocalyptic vision.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 20, 06 | 11:01 pm |
| [1] comments (567 views) |  | Permalink | [7] TrackBack |

Tue Sep 19, 2006

If the Pope has to apologize to Muslim radicals for inflaming them

Then where does that leave moderate Muslims who abhor the radicals?

No place.

How can they speak out against the radicals when powerful non-Muslims are afraid to do so, or are forced to apologize whenever they say anything that might offend the radicals? Westerner leaders set a poor example when they cave-in to the radicals.

Better to follow Aussie Prime Minister John Howard's example of telling Muslims to adapt to Western values:

Mr Howard sparked controversy yesterday after singling out Muslim migrants for refusing to embrace Australian values and urged them to fully integrate by treating women as equals and learning to speak English.

The call for a shift in attitude among some Muslims infuriated community leaders and comes as The Australian revealed the Prime Minister's own Islamic advisers have already accused Mr Howard and senior ministers of fuelling hatred and mistrust by using "inflammatory and derogatory" language.

But Mr Howard today stood by his comments. "I don't apologise," he told reporters. "I think they are missing the point and the point is that I don't care and the Australian people don't care where people come from.

"There's a small section of the Islamic population which is unwilling to integrate and I have said generally all migrants ... they have to integrate."

Mr Howard said during a talkback radio discussion yesterday: "There is a section, a small section of the Islamic population, and I say a small section ... which is very resistant to integration.

"Fully integrating means accepting Australian values, it means learning as rapidly as you can the English language if you don't already speak it.

"And it means understanding that in certain areas, such as the equality of men and women ... people who come from societies where women are treated in an inferior fashion have got to learn very quickly that that is not the case in Australia."




Posted by: Pat on Sep 19, 06 | 1:41 pm |
| [0] comments (561 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Sun Sep 17, 2006

Islamic Terrorist Darwin Awards

We need these for morale purposes

Braden Files has a great candidate for the Islamic Terrorist Darwin Awards:

Best Chuck Norris Moment - 13 May. Bad Guys arrived at the government center in the small town of Kubaysah to kidnap the town mayor, since they have a problem with any form of government that does not include regular beheadings and women wearing burqahs. There were seven of them. As they brought the mayor out to put him in a pick-up truck to take him off to be beheaded (on video, as usual), one of the bad Guys put down his machinegun so that he could tie the mayor's hands. The mayor took the opportunity to pick up the machinegun and drill five of the Bad Guys. The other two ran away. One of the dead Bad Guys was on our top twenty wanted list. Like they say, you can't fight City Hall.
Bet that story didn't make the NYT.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 17, 06 | 10:40 pm |
| [0] comments (630 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Sat Sep 16, 2006

The Web is replacing help files and manuals

This is good but has it's dangers

In the old days help files were essential. Not any more. I use search engines 99% of the time. When I get an obscure and unexpected error message I google it. I get an answer far faster than I would if I struggled through the horrible help that Bill Gates delivered with .net.

Lot's of times I find my answer on a forum. People have a problem, post a question, and experts who've solved the problem, post answers. I contribute to forums, though I tend to spend my time on Marathon forums. Want to know how to stop your nipples bleeding? I know the answer. Search engines scan the forums and the best answers get shared with the world.

But suppose the question is "How can I make TATP?" Easy. Type that into Google and you get all the information you need to create an extremely dangerous terrorist weapon. That's what Richard Reid had in his shoes.






Posted by: Pat on Sep 16, 06 | 11:38 pm |
| [0] comments (579 views) |  | Permalink | [6] TrackBack |

Light blogging

Got the coding bug

My boss and I have a little software business on the side. Our product was getting a little old, so I was trying to figure out how to move from old Microsoft technology to new Microsoft technology. I scribbled down a couple of thoughts on Friday, came home and converted the scribbles into working code over the next 24 hours. My wife wanted to know what I was doing. I tried showing her what I was trying to do but I couldn't seem to simplify enough. Eventually I found the key, "Our product was in French. I'm converting it to English."

There's a ways to go, but now the direction is clear. Why write a scripting language when Bill Gates has given us C# and VB.net?

Posted by: Pat on Sep 16, 06 | 11:22 pm |
| [0] comments (529 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Thu Sep 14, 2006

The Day's best blooper

From Fox News

Watching O'Reilly (default option since I can't eat dinner with my wife and surf blogs at the same time) and Ed Gillepsie is on and he says something about the war between "Islam and Infidelity". I know where he was headed, being an infidel of the worst kind, but it was funny. O'Reilly didn't laugh.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 14, 06 | 10:59 pm |
| [0] comments (707 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Wed Sep 13, 2006

In memory of Vincent Laieta

Died 9/11/2001 at WTC 2

This post is part of 2,996: A Tribute to the Victims of 9-11

image

On September 11th, 2001 2,996 people going about their lives were murdered by Islamic terrorists. One of those lost was Vincent Laieta. He was a good man who surely did not deserve his fate. His cousin James Laieta wrote a tribute to Vincent that conveys his spirit and character:

We never got the chance to say goodbye. You were our inspiration. We grew up as brothers. Your patient, loving, and golden heart stays forever in our memories. I was your sponsor for Confirmation; but you were my rock to lean on. Having you on this earth was a slice of heaven. You listened with your heart. Vinny's eyes were the windows to his soul. You were our hero in so many ways. We miss you more than words can express. Is it too late to say how you made our life so special in your quiet way?
My life with all its twists and turns; I made mistakes you always knew that I would learn. You were the light inside of us. God, this hurts. Send us: Your loving patience in dealing with the family, your understanding heart when counseling those you loved, and most of all your gentle spirit when solving life's problems. Take care my golden friend. Until we meet again -- I will cherish the times we spent together. May the Lord Bless and keep you. Our family will never be the same again. Happy one year anniversary.
Forever In Our Hearts, James P. Laieta, Jr.

The Staten Island Advance published a memorial to Vincent Laieta. It tells us more about the good man stolen from this world:
Vincent Laieta, 31, Aon Corp. vice president of operations

At 8:52 a.m. on Sept. 11, moments after the first plane hit 1 World Trade Center, Vincent Laieta paged his friend to let him know he was leaving Tower 2, where he worked on the 100th floor as vice president of operations for Aon Corp. That was the last confirmed contact anyone had with the 31-year-old Mr. Laieta, who is among the missing in the terrorist attacks.

His wife, the former Carol Murphy, tried frantically to reach him by calling his pager. She saw the events unfold on television and recalled, "I couldn't believe it, it was like watching a bad movie."

Since it was early in the morning, only a handful of Aon Corp. employees had arrived for work. According to witnesses, four of the co-workers Mr. Laieta was with escaped safely. Though some people in his department took elevators, he opted to take the stairs.

Born in Dongan Hills, Mr. Laieta moved to an apartment in New Dorp following his marriage in 1995. In 1996, the couple settled in Edison, N.J.

He graduated from Monsignor Farrell High School in 1988, and earned his bachelor of science degree in accounting from St. John's University, Grymes Hill. He was proud of the fact that he passed the CPA exam in August.

Mr. Laieta was active in Staten Island Little League, both as a player in his younger years and more recently as a coach. But he was more than a baseball fan, said his wife, who noted that her husband enjoyed all sports and particularly liked golf.

Mr. Laieta enjoyed vacationing in Ocean City, Md., where his family owned a condominium, and he liked going to the beach.

He was a parishioner of St. Francis of Assisi R.C. Cathedral, Metuchen, N.J. In addition to his wife, Carol, surviving are his 13-month-old son, Kevin Vincent; his parents, Vincent and Josephine; a brother, Anthony, and his grandmother, Anna Seery.
As I learned more about Vincent, I got sadder and madder. Vincent won't be able to coach his son Kevin in Little League. He won't be able to take Kevin to his first Big Leauge game. His wife Carol has had the man of her life stolen away. His friends, family and work mates are missing his smile, the twinkle in his eyes, and his essential goodness. To what end? Vincent's precious life was snuffed out in an act of unimaginable evil.

Never forget Vincent and everyone else who lost their lives on 9/11. Never forgive their murderers. And remember with all your heart that the people who murdered Vincent have sworn to kill us all.

p.s. I wanted to participate in the tribute to the 9/11 victims, and I was given the name of Vincent Laieta. My wife and I were overwhelmed to read about Vinny. The two tributes we found brought us to tears. The world has lost a good man, and we felt rage and sorrow for his family and friends. If any of Vinny's family or friends read this, we would be grateful to hear from you. Both of us are moved to write to you but could not locate any street or e-mail addresses. Email pat at asininity.com.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 13, 06 | 10:49 pm |
| [3] comments (654 views) |  | Permalink | [175] TrackBack |

How many more soldiers have to die before we start fighting?

The US military could have taken out a bunch of Taliban but were too nice to do so

This report via Donklephant boggles the imagination:

Army intelligence officers confirm the grainy black and white aerial photo taken by a Predator drone and obtained by NBC News on Tuesday shows some 190 suspected Taliban militants standing in several rows near a vehicle in an open field in Afghanistan.

The military said Wednesday that the group seen in the Predator image was likely gathered for a religious ceremony.“During the observation of the group over a significant period of time, it was determined that the group was located on the grounds of a cemetery and were likely conducting a funeral for Taliban insurgents killed in a coalition operation nearby earlier in the day,” a coalition spokesperson said. “A decision was made not to strike this group of insurgents at that specific location and time.”
Unbelievable. How many people will those 190 terrorists kill? How many teachers will they behead? How many suicide bombs will they set off? How many coalition soldiers will they kill?


Update: A contrary view by Macranger suggests that:
Rules of war are a bitch at times I know, especially when we are the only country that follows them. Still, after checking around I believe this was the right decision as no doubt (while not said here), the whereabouts of these terrorists as scouts have been keeping an eye on them since, and that may be why they were left untouched. In other words more valuable if left in play.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 13, 06 | 10:05 pm |
| [0] comments (675 views) |  | Permalink | [434] TrackBack |

Will O'Reilly explain why the oil companies have let gas prices fall so much so quickly?

After all, he claimed that the oil companies were gouging consumers

Cap'n Arbyte took O'Reilly to task for claiming that:

What we do know, because the law demands it, is what kind of profits the oil companies are making each quarter and those profits are astronomical during a tough time for America. We know for sure that while millions of Americans are hurting financially, the oil companies are rolling in dough.
Now that gas prices have dropped from $3 to $2.50 or less in the space of a couple of months I don't expect O'Reilly to continue his populist campaign against oil company profits. More likely he'll take credit for forcing the oil companies to drop prices to help the folks.

Update (9/14): I saw $2.09 on the way home after my run this evening.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 13, 06 | 9:26 pm |
| [0] comments (542 views) |  | Permalink | [22] TrackBack |

Tue Sep 12, 2006

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Especially when it comes to the French

Readers of blogs like mine are well aware that the French have been no friends of the US. They supplied Saddam with nuclear technology, subverted the Oil-for-Food program and tried to stop Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Baron Bodissey at Gates of Vienna has a wonderful history lesson in a post titled "The Other September 11th":

September 11th, 1683, the day when an alliance of Christian armies led by Jan III Sobieski, the King of Poland, arrived at the Gates of Vienna.
Vienna was under siege by the Ottoman empire. Back to Baron Bodissey:
One of the main reasons the Turks had had such success in the Balkans and Eastern Europe was that their Christian enemies were unable to unite against them. Since the Caliphate and the Ottoman Empire were one and the same thing, Islam experienced no such fractiousness, and it was a united horde that advanced inexorably through the mountain passes and across the plains towards Vienna.

Austria and Poland had long been traditional enemies, only lately coming to an alliance in the face of the common threat. Poland had traditionally been allied with France, but the French were devious even in alliance, especially under Louis XIV, the Sun King. Louis had designs on the German states along the Rhine, and conducted his diplomacy with an eye towards the main chance in Luxembourg or the Rhenish Palatinates.

All of these squabbling political entities were Catholic, and theoretically united under the leadership of Rome. Pope Innocent XI recognized the danger posed by the Ottomans, and, in the name of God and the Church, called on all the rulers of Central Europe to unite against the common foe and save Vienna.

Louis XIV declined to obey his pontiff, and continued his scheming.
The French scheming paid off:
And King Louis continued his campaign against the German states: in the absence of their defenders, Luxembourg and other small German states were unable to resist, and were annexed by the French.
So, we should not have surprised when the French reneged on the UN brokered "peace deal" between Israel and Lebanon.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 12, 06 | 11:29 pm |
| [0] comments (584 views) |  | Permalink | [202] TrackBack |

Is this how the Left views 9/11?

It sure seems that way

A Commenter at Outside the Beltway parodies the Left's 9/11 belief system. Here's a sample:

We believe that Bush, Cheney, and Republicans bear sole responsibility for 9/11;

We believe that the United States and its policies are responsible for making terrorists attack this country;

We believe that if we get rid of George Bush and the Republicans, we will once again be safe;

We believe that the people of America who supported those policies over the years (during Republican administrations) are little Eichmanns, and deserved to die on 9/11 ;

We are ready to believe (if the polls support us) that Bush and Cheney actually planned the events of 9/11 as a prelude to taking over this country, destroying our civil liberties; and instituting a fascist state.

We believe that Israel probably had a part in the events of 9/11, working with Bush and Cheney in some sort of neocon plot;

We believe that the only people who are innocent of 9/11 are the actual terrorists who plotted and executed it;

We believe that Bill Clinton and his administration had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 and that, if Al Gore had won the 2000 election then 9/11 would never have happened;

We believe that anyone who disagrees with the above statement is trying to distort history and their views should be prohibited. Only we –and Michael Moore– know the truth and should be heard.
Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to parody the nonsense emanating from the reality based community.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 12, 06 | 10:11 am |
| [0] comments (522 views) |  | Permalink | [140] TrackBack |

Mon Sep 11, 2006

The Path to 9/11 - part 2

Congratulations to ABC for airing a poignant reminder of 9/11

I've got some major complaints. Richard Clarke's role is grossly over-stated. Condoleeza Rice and Dick Cheney are painted as leftist caricatures. Cheney comes off as a doddering old fool. Not so good.

On the other hand, they captured the collective failure to see the warning signals, the bureaucratic infighting that crippled our ability to respond, the impact of events in Afghanistan to what happened on 9/11, and the religious motives of our enemy. I was real happy to see the reference to Atta's attempt to get a loan to buy a crop-dusting plane. Of course, why would he want a crop-dusting plane when he was due to fly a 757 into the WTC? Anthrax anyone?

The problem for the anti-war brigade is that the drama, taken as a whole, makes the case for fighting Muslim terrorists. No wonder the appeasers in the Democratic party are unhappy.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 11, 06 | 10:17 pm |
| [0] comments (512 views) |  | Permalink | [160] TrackBack |

Sun Sep 10, 2006

ABC has done the nation a service

Forget the partisan sniping

It's all too complicated to track all the players and the details but the viewer is given a unique view of the enemy. It's not a who-screwed-up so much as who the enemy is. By screaming blue murder about details, the Clintonistas have attracted more viewers than would have watched otherwise.

What we see is people in the field getting stymied by Washington politics. The only real hero so far is Ahmed Shah Massoud.

More later...

Posted by: Pat on Sep 10, 06 | 10:05 pm |
| [0] comments (541 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Sat Sep 09, 2006

How dangerous was the airline bombing plot?

Thomas Greene writing at the Register isn't convinced there was a threat

Greene writes:

By now you'll be asking why these jihadist wannabes didn't conspire simply to bring TATP onto planes, colored with a bit of vegetable dye, and disguised as, say, a powdered fruit-flavored drink. The reason is that they would be afraid of failing: TATP is notoriously sensitive and unstable. Mainstream journalists like to tell us that terrorists like to call it "the mother of Satan." (Whether this reputation is deserved, or is a consequence of homebrewing by unqualified hacks, remains open to debate.)

It's been claimed that the 7/7 bombers used it, but this has not been positively confirmed. Some sources claim that they used C-4, and others that they used RDX. Nevertheless, the belief that they used TATP has stuck with the media, although going about in a crowded city at rush hour with an unstable homebrew explosive in a backpack is not the brightest of all possible moves. It's surprising that none of the attackers enjoyed an unscheduled launch into Paradise.

So the fabled binary liquid explosive - that is, the sudden mixing of hydrogen peroxide and acetone with sulfuric acid to create a plane-killing explosion, is out of the question. Meanwhile, making TATP ahead of time carries a risk that the mission will fail due to premature detonation, although it is the only plausible approach.

Certainly, if we can imagine a group of jihadists smuggling the necessary chemicals and equipment on board, and cooking up TATP in the lavatory, then we've passed from the realm of action blockbusters to that of situation comedy.

It should be small comfort that the security establishments of the UK and the USA - and the "terrorism experts" who inform them and wheedle billions of dollars out of them for bomb puffers and face recognition gizmos and remote gait analyzers and similar hi-tech phrenology gear - have bought the Hollywood binary liquid explosive myth, and have even acted upon it.

We've given extraordinary credit to a collection of jihadist wannabes with an exceptionally poor grasp of the mechanics of attacking a plane, whose only hope of success would have been a pure accident. They would have had to succeed in spite of their own ignorance and incompetence, and in spite of being under police surveillance for a year.
I'm not so sure that they couldn't have smuggled TATP aboard a plane. Greene rightly suggest skepticsm about Jihadists brewing TATP on board. However, we still have the mysterious case of Joel Hinrichs. He blew the top half of his body off using home-brewed TATP. Tapscott notes that:
Authorities found two to three pounds of the deadly "Mother of Satan" [TATP] explosive favored by Middle Eastern terrorists in Hinrichs' apartment - far more than needed for suicide - as well as materials used in anti-personnel bombs, which is also characteristic of Middle Eastern terrorists
Hinrichs walked some distance to the stadium and may have tried to get in before he blew himself up. So, TATP may not be as unstable as Greene claims.

Greene is right to note that the authorities expend too much effort closing the last loop-hole rather than anticipating the next one:
It's a pity that our security rests in the hands of government officials who understand as little about terrorism as the Florida clowns who needed their informant to suggest attack scenarios, as the 21/7 London bombers who injured no one, as lunatic "shoe bomber" Richard Reid, as the Forest Gate nerve gas attackers who had no nerve gas, as the British nitwits who tried to acquire "red mercury," and as the recent binary liquid bomb attackers who had no binary liquid bombs.
On the other hand, a few lightly armed terrorists brought us 9/11. The loop-hole they exploited was the prevailing assumption that hijackers take planes and passengers hostage. And then we have the two Russian jets that everyone forgets about. Greene does suggest other potential risks that the authorities aren't checking for.

There will be another successful airline attack. Worse, it may take that before the authorities start profiling in earnest.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 09, 06 | 2:27 pm |
| [1] comments (488 views) |  | Permalink | [21] TrackBack |

Thu Sep 07, 2006

Indonesia's Double Standard

Muslim Terrorists get off easy; Infidel Drug Smugglers get death

While some of those involved in the Bali bombing got death sentences, many got off very lightly. Some have even had their sentences cut. Abu Bakar Bashir, the Osama bin Ladin of the Bali bombers, got an early release from prison.

Meanwhile, a group of young Australians caught trying to smuggle heroin from Indonesia to Australia got death sentences or life imprisonment.

I hold no brief for drug smugglers but giving terrorist masterminds pitiful prison sentences, followed by early release, while executing low-level drug smugglers seems disproportionate.

At least letting Abu Bakar Bashir out gives us a chance to know how the enemy thinks. Jihad Watch has been keeping track and caught an Al Jazeera interview with Bashir. Here's a sample of his brilliance:

Sadly over the centuries Islam grew weak and we forgot that the Prophet carried a spear when he spoke. The spear was replaced with a staff (tongkat) instead, as if Muslims were weak and needed a walking-stick to stand up! We need to go back to this original, strong, robust Islam. Like the Prophet we need to carry the spear (tombak) again. If the Prophet carried a spear, then for us today we can carry an M-16!

Muslim leaders today have fallen short of the Prophet's example. They mouth empty pious phrases about how they yearn for an Islamic state, but they dont have the guts or will to do it.

There is not a single Islamic state in the world, not even in Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are hypocrites and friends of the United States; their leaders are all corrupt and worldly.

The closest we ever got to an Islamic state was the Taliban government in Afghanistan, but the Americans destroyed that, with their Western allies.
An M-16? Without Infidel technology Allah's holy warriors would still be running around with spears.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 07, 06 | 9:59 pm |
| [0] comments (551 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Tue Sep 05, 2006

What is going on in Pakistan?

Sounds like very bad news

This ABC report set off all sorts of alarm bells:

Osama bin Laden, America's most wanted man, will not face capture in Pakistan if he agrees to lead a "peaceful life," Pakistani officials tell ABC News.

The surprising announcement comes as Pakistani army officials announced they were pulling their troops out of the North Waziristan region as part of a "peace deal" with the Taliban.

If he is in Pakistan, bin Laden "would not be taken into custody," Major General Shaukat Sultan Khan told ABC News in a telephone interview, "as long as one is being like a peaceful citizen."

Bin Laden is believed to be hiding somewhere in the tribal areas of Pakistan, near the Afghanistan border, but U.S. officials say his precise location is unknown.

In addition to the pullout of Pakistani troops, the "peace agreement" between Pakistan and the Taliban also provides for the Pakistani army to return captured Taliban weapons and prisoners.

"What this means is that the Taliban and al Qaeda leadership have effectively carved out a sanctuary inside Pakistan," said ABC News consultant Richard Clarke, the former White House counter-terrorism director.
Pakistan has become a sanctuary for the Taliban. While that sanctuary exists Afghanistan cannot be stabilized. I suspect that Pakistan has figured that the Republicans are toast and that the Democrats will let things return to the cozy pre-9/11 status quo. Bush needs to act. I'd suggest a deal that gives US special forces free reign in Waziristan. Pakistan would be most upset if the US made India a partner in missile defense systems, for example.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 05, 06 | 10:52 pm |
| [0] comments (585 views) |  | Permalink | [7] TrackBack |

Mon Sep 04, 2006

Formation Flying

Why it's important

The Blue Angels were in town Labor Day weekend. We rushed up to our rooftop deck to watch them do their stuff. I tried taking pictures of them with my little Canon S400. There was more fun to be had trying to take the pictures than seeing the results. I'm posting this one because it shows the pilots flying in tight formation in a difficult manoeuvre.

image
My wife's uncle is a retired Air Force fighter pilot. He signed up during WW2 but didn't see service. He fought in Korea, flew transport planes into Berlin during the blockade (they were short of pilots), and fought in Vietnam. He said that flying in the Blue Angels is the toughest job in flying. He told us that flying in tight formation was extremely stressful and difficult, but military pilots are trained to do it. It served him well. He was flying in Panama on a mission and a bird hit his windshield. It didn't break but the glass crazed and he couldn't see out of it. No problem. He had a wingman and he could see him out of the side window. So, they flew in formation back to base and landed in unison. That formation training saved his life.

Back in his early days he was training in prop planes. They were flying in formation and coming into a rural airport to land. He'd gotten a little ahead and his flight leader told him to pull up his nose a bit to wash off some speed and bring him back in line. Unfortunately, this restricted his view of the landing strip. As he touched down a cow walked into the way. The prop converted the unfortunate cow into instant hamburger and covered the plane in blood and guts. He taxied it to maintenance and received the requisite amount of abuse for bending the prop and bloodying up their aircraft. Next morning he heads out to his plane for the next training flight. The plane had been restored to perfect flying condition and the aircrew had painted a little cow on the cockpit canopy.

The spirit of American military pilots lives on. They serve and dare so that we may be secure.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 04, 06 | 8:36 pm |
| [0] comments (618 views) |  | Permalink | [0] TrackBack |

Sat Sep 02, 2006

Conversion to Islam is a hot topic

But the enemy is letting the cat out of the bag

Militant Islam is dedicated to killing Westerners or converting them to Islam. That's what they tell us in their own words. Go back to the Bali bombing and the man jailed for organizing the attack. The Melbourne Age reported:

Abu Bakar Bashir is the elderly cleric Western intelligence has identified as the man most likely to have organised Saturday night's Kuta [Bali] slaughter.

While he firmly denies any involvement in the carnage, there's no sign from Bashir, the head of a Muslim boys' boarding school, of sympathy for those young Westerners, about the same age as his charges, who perished in those "sinful nightclubs".

In a land dominated by moderate Muslims, Mr Bashir is a genuine radical. And he's not about to compromise his views or his comments to make his message more palatable for "infidels" in the West, even those in Australia grieving now for their lost loved ones.

Asked if there was anything he wanted to say to families who lost relatives in the bomb blast, he said: "My message to the families is please convert to Islam as soon as possible."

Mr Bashir offered no sympathy for those who died; just his belief that by converting to Islam, the survivors could ensure they would avoid the fate of those non-Muslims who died and went to hell.
Bashir has now been punished for his role in the Bali massacre. An Indonesian court sentenced him to 30 months (sic) in prison. He was recently released after serving just 24 months. By those standards, OBL would get, say, 5 years in Indonesia and be released to wide acclaim, after serving 4 years.

The same message has been repeated by Al Qaeda in its October 2004 and September 2006 tales. Michael Scheuer, author of Imperial Hubris, read OBL's October 2004 tape as a sign that another mass casualty attack on the US is imminient.
Scheuer believes al Qaeda is set to strike the US, and soon.
After 9/11, bin Laden received sharp criticisms from Islamist scholars that dealt with the al-Qaeda chief's failure to satisfy several religious requirements pertinent to waging war. The critique focused on three items: (1) insufficient warning; (2) failure to offer Americans a chance to convert to Islam; and (3) inadequate religious authorization to kill so many people. Bin Laden accepted these criticisms and in mid-2002 began a series of speeches and actions to remedy the shortcomings and satisfy his Islamist critics before again attacking in the United States.
Scheuer believes the October 2004 tape, the one that showed up just prior to the election, completed the last step bin Laden believed he needed before being able to strike at the US in a mass casualty attack with a clear caliphascist conscience.
Coincidentally, the latest tape mentions Sheuer, according to this transcript posted by Michelle Malkin:
If the Zionist crusader missionaries of hate and counter-Islam consultants like Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Michael Scheuer, Steven Emerson, and yes, even the crusader-in-chief George W. Bush were to abandon their unbelief and repent and enter into the light of Islam and turn their swords against the enemies of God, it would be accepted of them and they would be our brothers in Islam. And we send a special invitation to all of you fighting Bush's crusader pipe dream in Afghanistan, Iraq, and wherever else W. has sent you to die.
Al Qaeda and company are not the only Muslim nutjobs inviting us to "enter the light of Islam". Remember the letter that Iranian President and well watcher Ahmadinejad sent to George Bush. Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch wrote:
Confirming my observation here. "President says his letter to President Bush was invitation to Islam," from the Islamic Republic News Agency, with thanks to Store Manager:

Jakarta, May 11, IRNA -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said here Thursday that his letter to President George W. Bush did not concern the nuclear dossier, but rather was an invitation to Islam and the prophets culture.

He made the above remarks in reply to a reporter while attending press conference on his letter to President Bush in Jakarta in the afternoon of the third day of his stay in Jakarta.

Stressing that the letter was beyond the nuclear issue, the chief executive said that in principle, the country's nuclear case is not so significant to make him write a letter about it.

"We act according to laws and our activities are quite clear. We are rather intent on solving more fundamental global matters.

"The letter was an invitation to monotheism and justice, which are common to all divine prophets. If the call is responded positively, there will be no more problems to be solved," added the president.

The president said that the letter actually contained a clear message of invitation to human beliefs, adding that its response will determine the future....

Both bolded statements suggest that the letter was indeed the call to Islam that must precede any attack, in accord with Muhammad's words (in Sahih Muslim 4294) about inviting the unbelievers to accept Islam or dhimmitude and fighting him only if he refuses both.
So this is the deal that the various Muslim nutjobs are offering us unenlightened infidels:
We invite you to convert to Islam. If you don't accept then our God, the only true God, says we must kill you.
That's the deal, but our PC MSM will not spell it out to us. Fortunately, the Muslim nutjobs are making certain their message gets out. The forced conversion of Steve Centanni and Olaf Wiig reinforced the message.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 02, 06 | 8:27 pm |
| [0] comments (551 views) |  | Permalink | [1] TrackBack |

Fri Sep 01, 2006

WTF was Fitzgerald doing?

If he knew Amitage leaked Plame's identity up front, why did he continue?

About the only logical reason I can think of was that his sole source of information was the Democratic Underground:

Team Bush vs. Team Cheney covering your ass covering your ass covering your ass covering your ass covering your ass
The story on everyone's lips right now is of course Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation into whether individuals inside the White House conspired to reveal the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame. We haven't commented much on this case of late, simply because until very recently there's been a lot more speculation than story.

However, as Fitzmas Day approaches, a flurry of leaks last week indicate that the administration could be in deep doo-doo.

First the Washington Post reported that the prosecutor has focused on Dick Cheney and Lewis Libby:

As the investigation into the leak of a CIA agent's name hurtles to an apparent conclusion, special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald has zeroed in on the role of Vice President Cheney's office, according to lawyers familiar with the case and government officials.

In grand jury sessions, including with New York Times reporter Judith Miller, Fitzgerald has pressed witnesses on what Cheney may have known about the effort to push back against ex-diplomat and Iraq war critic Joseph C. Wilson IV, including the leak of his wife's position at the CIA, Miller and others said. But Fitzgerald has focused more on the role of Cheney's top aides, including Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, lawyers involved in the case said.

Uh oh. That doesn't bode well for Team Cheney.

And not long after that report was released, Raw Story learned that one of Cheney's aides may have spilled the beans to the prosecutor:

A senior aide to Vice President Dick Cheney is cooperating with special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson, sources close to the investigation say.

Individuals familiar with Fitzgerald’s case tell RAW STORY that John Hannah, a senior national security aide on loan to Vice President Dick Cheney from the offices of then-Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs, John Bolton, was named as a target of Fitzgerald’s probe. They say he was told in recent weeks that he could face imminent indictment for his role in leaking Plame-Wilson's name to reporters unless he cooperated with the investigation.

Others close to the probe say that if Hannah is cooperating with the special prosecutor then he was likely going to be charged as a co-conspirator and may have cut a deal.

Kapow! But Team Cheney wasn't going to take that lying down. One day later, the New York Daily News reported that:

An angry President Bush rebuked chief political guru Karl Rove two years ago for his role in the Valerie Plame affair, sources told the Daily News.

"He made his displeasure known to Karl," a presidential counselor told The News. "He made his life miserable about this."

(snip)

Bush has always known that Rove often talks with reporters anonymously and he generally approved of such contacts, one source said.

But the President felt Rove and other members of the White House damage-control team did a clumsy job in their campaign to discredit Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, the ex-diplomat who criticized Bush's claim that Saddam Hussen tried to buy weapons-grade uranium in Niger.

A second well-placed source said some recently published reports implying Rove had deceived Bush about his involvement in the Wilson counterattack were incorrect and were leaked by White House aides trying to protect the President.

"Bush did not feel misled so much by Karl and others as believing that they handled it in a ham-handed and bush-league way," the source said.

Score three points for Team Cheney. Bush, of course, has maintained from the very beginning that "I don't know all the facts. I want to know all the facts. I would like this to end as quickly as possible. If someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration." So if the Daily News story turns out to be true, it looks like Bush may have just had his very own Monica Moment.

But the game's not over yet - late in the week, the Associated Press reported that:

Top White House aides Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby discussed their contacts with reporters about an undercover CIA officer in the days before her identity was published, the first known intersection between two central figures in the criminal leak investigation.

Rove told grand jurors it was possible he first heard in the White House that Valerie Plame, wife of Bush administration Joseph Wilson, worked for the CIA from Libby's recounting of a conversation with a journalist, according to people familiar with his testimony.

Which the Los Angeles Times followed shortly afterwards with:

Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff was so angry about the public statements of former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, a Bush administration critic married to an undercover CIA officer, that he monitored all of Wilson's television appearances and urged the White House to mount an aggressive public campaign against him, former aides say.

Those efforts by the chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, began shortly after Wilson went public with his criticisms in 2003. But they continued into last year - well after the Justice Department began an investigation in September 2003, into whether administration officials had illegally disclosed the CIA operative's identity, say former White House aides.

Slam! Touchdown, Team Bush. Can you imagine how uncomfortable it must be inside the White House right now?

ROVE: Hi Scooter.

LIBBY: Hi Karl.

ROVE: So, uh, see you later then.

LIBBY: Right. Later.

ROVE: Jackass.

LIBBY: Moron.

For his part, George W. Bush dismissed the oncoming political hurricane as "background noise," "chatter," and "a lot of speculation and opining." But, he said, "The American people expect me to do my job, and I'm going to."

Thanks, George. Let us know when you plan to start.
That looks like the script Fitzgerald was following. A real-life Clouseau for the Left.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 01, 06 | 10:46 pm |
| [2] comments (582 views) |  | Permalink | [1] TrackBack |

Who should Plame & Wilson sue now?

Some bright spark has the right idea

Just One Minute covers the Plame Blame Game like crab grass:

CREATIVE LAWYERING: All of this will impact the Wilson lawsuit against Cheney, Libby, Rove et al, yes? Here is a clever suggestion from The Brainster:
...it looks like Rove and Libby didn't leak her name. But, considering that the money [Valerie Plame] was offered for her book was largely based on them doing so, it strikes me that she may still have a case. After all, now she's not going to make nearly as much dough. So maybe she can sue them for not leaking her name?
Yep, that'd be the ticket.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 01, 06 | 9:48 pm |
| [0] comments (598 views) |  | Permalink | [27] TrackBack |

Go to Main Page


Random Posts

WMD's Will Be Found

Can Jeb Bush run in 2008?

Liberals Facing the Truth?