![]() |
||
Judicious Search
Asinine StatsTotal entries: 3358 Most Popular EntriesAnother problem with Islam in the modern world (11415) ArchivesJanuary 2009December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 Syndicate RSSNews LinksABC News Contact Form |
Fri Nov 28, 2008The Mumbai massacres remind us that war is still ragingOfficial condemnation from the White House and the President-Elect will not stop them MataHarley at Flopping Aces gets it in one: What they are is yet another band of the Islamic jihad movement that wages war on land they wish to claim for their own Caliphate. Whether they wear an AQ badge, or carry membership cards doled out by Osama Bin Laden matters not one bit. They are part and parcel of the same universal enemy that is a rose by any other name.The correct US response is to bomb the crap out of any entity that supports the goals of radical Islam. Destroying Iran's nuclear program would be a good place to start. After all, in WW2, the first American land operation after Pearl Harbor was an attack on the Vichy French in North Africa. The Japs and the Nazi-loving Frogs had less in common than the Mad Mullahs and Al Qaeda, but the US whacked them anyway. We need to resurrect the WW2 spirit, the D-Day spirit, the spirit that made America the greatest force for good in the world, and use it to crush the evil of radical Islam in all its incarnations. And it is time to ask the so called moderate Muslims to make a choice - join civilization and fight the evil, or be condemned to join the Jihadists in hell. The Iraqi people have made that choice. They chose wisely. President Obama can use the Mumbai massacre to good effect if he vows revenge and takes strong action. Hint to Obama: A UN Security Council Resolution condemning the attack does not count. A few daisy cutters in Al Qaida/Taliban strongholds would be nice. Destroying Iran's nuclear infrastructure, while oil prices are so low, would send exactly the right message to our friends, our allies, our troops and our enemies. Herschel Smith at Captain's Journal writes: There are certainly unintended consequences to American imperialism, and the practice of fighting wars on soil other than our own is a costly affair, both monetarily and in terms of the human sacrifice. But there are also unintended consequences to isolationism too, and one such consequence might very well be that the sacrifice is even more costly when the fight is in one’s own back yard.Especially if it's an Iranian EMP attack launched from an innocent looking freighter off the Eastern seaboard. Mon Nov 24, 2008Final D-Day Message to Western Naval Task ForceInspirational words from Rear Admiral A. G. Kirk, U.S.N.
ALLIED EXPEDITIONARY FORCERear Admiral A. G. Kirk, U.S.N. commanded the Western Naval Task Force. His forces assaulted UTAH and OMAHA. My father-in-law skippered an LCT onto Utah beach on D-Day. He did not burn his copies of this letter. What strikes me about this letter is the forthright honesty of the commander. He says: These are not beaches held by apathetic Italians or defended by hasty fortifications. These are prepared position, held by Germans who have learned from their past failures. They have coastal batteries and mine-fields; they have bombers and E-boats and submarines. They will try to use them all. We are getting into a fight.But then he delivers the counter: But it is not we who have to fear the outcome. As the Germans learned from failure, we have learned from success. To this battle we bring our tested methods, with many new weapons, and overwhelming strength. I will be posting some more D-Day material over the next few weeks. Thu Nov 20, 2008I want a Pelosi GTxi SS/Rt Sport EditionLike a hole in my head Classic Iowahak truth-telling. Here's your automotive future: All new for 2012, the Pelosi GTxi SS/Rt Sport Edition is the mandatory American car so advanced it took $100 billion and an entire Congress to design it. We started with same reliable 7-way hybrid ethanol-biodeisel-electric-clean coal-wind-solar-pedal power plant behind the base model Pelosi, but packed it with extra oomph and the sassy styling pizazz that tells the world that 1974 Detroit is back again -- with a vengeance. Why is Obama recycling Clintonistas?Would you rather he recycled Carterites? Neo-Neocon explains why Obama has to choose from a limited pool and provides excellent historical context. She writes: The Clinton administration was the most recent Democrat presidency. To go back and try to find non-Clinton Democrats with experience in a previous administration, Obama would had to have reached back to the 70s and Carter. I for one am highly relieved that he has not done so—not only because many of those people would be ancient (or dead), but because I think that for the most part Carter’s policies were more disastrous than Clinton’s. But these two administrations—Clinton’s and Carter’s—are pretty much the only games in town for Obama if he wants Democrats with previous experience at that level.If Obama sticks with Gates for SOD, I'd be relieved. It would mean that he has thrown all his code-Pink campaign rhetoric under the bus. He's been good at throwing harmful associates and supporters under the bus. Tue Nov 18, 2008Card Check and the UAWWho'd want to join a union after seeing what the UAW did to Detroit?
Powerline has a chart showing the pre-tax operating profit per vehicle for the real Big 3 (Honda, Nissan and Toyota) and the Detroit Big 3. Honda makes about $1500 per vehicle. GM loses almost as much. That $3000 difference is the cost of meeting the retirement and health care entitlements that GM provides UAW workers and retirees. The UAW won those benefits by threatening to strike if the Big 3 did not agree to their terms. The result is that the American auto industry is virtually bankrupt. Something has to give and it will be UAW jobs and benefits. Sun Nov 16, 2008How to beat the Fairness DoctrineBoycott the advertisers of weak MSM outlets
The New York Times just hit junk bond status. What would be the impact if a few thousand conservatives wrote to the NYT's major advertisers and threatened a boycott of their products until they stop advertising in the NYT? What would be the impact if sales actually dropped? Ditto MSNBC. Fri Nov 14, 2008So what if GM goes under?It won't cause the next depression
Car buyers will find the range of brands they can buy reduced but they will still buy something. The likelihood is that it will be a built-in-America car, be it Ford, Honda, or Toyota. The suppliers that supplied GM may also be supplying the other manufacturers. If the GM-only suppliers go out of business, then the other suppliers will gain business. The market will adjust to the new realities. Some regions will lose jobs; some will gain. Thu Nov 13, 2008WW2 War Bond Poster politically incorrectPity we can't have a modern day equivalent We found this great poster amongst some old family papers. Mon Nov 10, 2008Should Washington bail-out Detroit?We know they will, but should they?
Back in the post-war period, Britain had a thriving car industry. Some of it was owned by GM (Vauxhall), Ford (Ford), and Chrysler (Rootes Group). The domestic part was British Motors Corporation (BMC). It owned the brands Austin, Morris, Riley, MG (aka Morris Garages), Riley, and Worsley. It sort of expired in 1975 when it was nationalized. Obama's cabinet takes shapeHere's hoping the rumors aren't true, for Obama's sake
John Kerry for Secretary of State? What's he done except slime America's military while still serving, and lose an election Obama would have won in a landslide. Few other politicians, with the possible exception of Joe Biden, can talk so much and say so little. Sat Nov 08, 2008"Change" swings both waysUS lurches left, tiny New Zealand lurches right According to the Sydney Morning Herald: New Zealand's incoming prime minister John Key says his party's decisive win over the ruling Labour Party shows his nation has voted for change.Change sure is a powerful slogan. I suppose it beats "Fix what's broken, keep what's working, and scratch where it itches." (inspired by Eleanor Roosevelt's quip on sex: "Fill what's empty, empty what's full, and scratch where it itches.") New Zealand has had an interesting political history over the last forty years. The National Party is the right of center party; Labour the left. During the 60's and 70's, the National Party, under Robert Muldoon, acted like protectionist Democrats, or worse, North Korea's leadership. The slogan was Think Big; the results poor: the government borrowed heavily and pumped the funds into large-scale industrial projects, would create trickle-down benefits in the form of jobs and revenue. This never happened: most of the Think Big projects yielded minimal profit whilst Muldoon was still Prime Minister and many were hampered by industrial disputesPerhaps the contemporary US equivalent is pumping tax-payer money into the Big 3. In 1984, the National government got thrown out, replace by a Labor government with a commitment to free markets that rivaled Thatcher's. Under the leadership of finance minster Roger Douglas: Political commentator Bruce Jesson argued that Douglas acted fast to achieve a complete economic revolution within one parliamentary term, in case he did not get a second chance.[5] The reforms can be summarised as the dismantling of the Australasian model of state development that had existed for the previous 90 years, and its replacement by the Anglo-American neoliberal orthodoxy based on the monetarist policies of Milton Friedman and the Chicago School.[1] The financial market was deregulated and controls on foreign exchange removed. Subsidies to many industries, notably agriculture, were removed or significantly reduced, as was tariff protection. The marginal tax rate was halved over a number of years from 66% to 33%; this was paid for by the introduction of a tax on goods and services (GST) initially at 10%, later 12.5%, and a surtax on superannuation, which had been made universal from age 60 by the previous government.Douglas' policies didn't go down too well with generations of New Zealanders brought up on Swedish style social welfare. Labor lost power to National, which continued Douglas' policies until 1993. Since then, New Zealand has tried to regain its socialist past. Under leftist Labor leader Helen Clark, it hasn't worked. Roger Douglas knows why: The patient's diagnosis is quite clear. Government spending is now $15 billion per annum above the baseline trajectory that had been operating prior to Labour taking office. In 1999 tax revenue was $32 billion. Only 8 years later it's $52 billion, instead of $37 billion. Excessive spending has built a hot house environment with inflationary pressures that flow into every corner of the economy. Wages, prices, house costs, rents, mortgage rates and electricity all feel the relentless push from government overspending. Productivity has slowed to a crawl, while the rise in the standard of living, allowing for inflation, gradually subsides for most people, especially traditional Labour voters. It's a replay of Robert Muldoon. Thanks to excessive state spending and overuse of credit cards we import more and more. The government's spendthrift nature infects individual behaviour right across the country. High domestic interest rates are only one of the sideline results of excessive spending, like diabetes resulting from over-eating. The dollar soars because overseas investors are looking for a quick buck. They won't invest long-term in an economic graveyard.Disclosure: I'm one of that one million. Will military morale plummet under Obama?Anecdotal evidence suggest it already has
Talked to a running friend this morning, whose boyfriend is serving in Afghanistan. He flies combat helicopters. She said that he, and many of his military friends, were disgusted with the election result, and will not re up. Fri Nov 07, 2008Obama has a chance to capture the political centerIf he succeeds he will win in 2012
All he has to do is satisfy a few benchmarks: Thu Nov 06, 2008Bashing SarahNot wise, sore losers
We've been seeing stories and leaks about Sarah being a Diva, Sarah being a spendthrift, Sarah going off-message, and Sarah losing the election for McCain. Wed Nov 05, 2008The constant drumbeat of an Obama win workedThe white vote was suppressed American Thinker's Richard Baehr writes: Total turnout for President came in nowhere near the record numbers some were forecasting: 140 million or more. The total vote for President might not exceed the 2004 level of 122 million by very much at all (currently 118 million with 96% of the votes counted). What that means is that with higher turnout by African Americans and Hispanics, about 2% higher as a share of the total vote in each case, that white turnout was down from 2004. Some Republicans (and Democrats and independents) stayed home. There is no other conclusion. Tue Nov 04, 2008Dems destroy economy, reap electoral rewardSort of ironic
Fannie and Freddie were Democrat fiefdoms. They created the sub prime mortgage mess yet the GOP got blamed. Of course, the GOP, starting with McCain, did nothing to separate themselves from that disaster. Mon Nov 03, 2008Obama's job applicationPretty mediocre resume Wizbang scored a copy. Check it before you vote. If Obama wins, we'll pay dearlyBut will the electorate learn how bad the Democrats are?
Obama's campaign has done a good job of selling a totally inexperienced, ruthlessly ambitious Marxist as Presidential material. The MSM have been rooting so hard for Obama it is a wonder that McCain/Palin are within ten points in the polls. The unfortunate probability is that we'll wake up on November 5th with Obama as our next President. Sun Nov 02, 2008Does McCain have any hope?Not if you read the MSM and read the polls
But we few have some strands of hope.
|
Random PostsPhony Foley PollingBlood Thirsty French Counting the sacrifices |
| www.asininity.com 2001-2003PHP | hosting provided by pMachine |