![]() |
||
Judicious Search
Asinine StatsTotal entries: 3222 Most Popular EntriesAnother problem with Islam in the modern world (10666) ArchivesAugust 2008July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 Syndicate RSSNews LinksABC News Contact Form |
Fri Nov 05, 2004Bush fought cleanKerry and the MSM fought dirty
Besides the constant stream of biased reporting from the New York Times, the Boston Globe, the LA Times, and the major networks, we had deliberate attempts to destroy the President through fake memos and bogus stories about lost explosives. But that leaves open the broader question of what was going on with the exit polls. They were ridiculously far off the mark. Dick Morris, for one, thinks that properly conducted exit polling could never be so inaccurate, that these exit poll data were clearly fraudulent, and that an investigation should be conducted. It seems likely that Democrats ran the exit polling process, and deliberately generated bad data to create momentum for the Kerry campaign. This much, I think is a reasonable inference. It is also reasonable to suspect that the same people who created the bad data leaked it to Democratic bloggers as part of a strategy of depressing Republican turnout. The bloggers, however, were innocent participants in the deception--if, in fact, it was a deception.I suppose the irony is that the Kerry camp got taken in too; their early elation turned into depression when actual counts revealed the truth. Can you imagine what the margin would have been if the media had reported fairly, and only US citizens who were legally registered had voted? Bush won a dirty election against all predicted odds. Update on the 2000 Election: Jim Miller points to solid evidence that the Democrats stole about 15,000 Bush votes in Palm Beach county. The 2004 result provides further evidence. Yesterday, it occurred to me that a comparison between this year's election results and the 2000 election results could give us one more bit of evidence that some Democratic operative(s) in Palm Beach almost stole the 2000 presidential election. One thing that struck me in 2000 is that Bush's percentage of the vote in the county was lower than the percentage of Republicans registered there. That's extraordinary in a close election. Was the same true this year? No. According to the data I unloaded from the office of the Florida Secretary of State, 32 percent of the voters in Palm Beach registered as Republicans, and 45 percent registered as Democrats. Bush's 39 percent of the vote this year is just what one would expect from those registration numbers — and much higher than it was in 2000.Is anyone surprised that the votes were stolen? Or that the MSM could care less? [0] comments [1311] Views | Permalink | [1720] TrackBack |
|
Random PostsKerry has a "Litmus Test" for judgesDid Instapundit shed any light on 9/11 before it happened? If Bush had played hardball |
| Judicious Asininity >>www.asininity.com 2004PHP |